<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Caller Id Spoofing Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php</link>
	<description>Free Caller Id Spoofing - Change Your Caller ID To Another Number</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Congress</title>
		<link>http://freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php/comment-page-1#comment-6763</link>
		<dc:creator>US Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freecalleridspoofing.com/?p=228#comment-6763</guid>
		<description>The law specifically says that masking caller id is okay (such as with *67 or whatever the combo is) but intentionally falsifying it would be illegal. The bill states it would be illegal &quot;to cause any caller ID service to transmit misleading or inaccurate caller ID information, with the intent to defraud or deceive.&quot; So products like Google Voice and Magic Jack should be fine since the info they present is not &quot;misleading,&quot; &quot;inaccurate,&quot; or deceitful. But it would be if I spoofed my caller ID to say I was Edward James Olmos. I suppose we&#039;ll just have to wait and see how the law actually plays out and what they officially define as &quot;misleading&quot; and &quot;deceit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law specifically says that masking caller id is okay (such as with *67 or whatever the combo is) but intentionally falsifying it would be illegal. The bill states it would be illegal &#8220;to cause any caller ID service to transmit misleading or inaccurate caller ID information, with the intent to defraud or deceive.&#8221; So products like Google Voice and Magic Jack should be fine since the info they present is not &#8220;misleading,&#8221; &#8220;inaccurate,&#8221; or deceitful. But it would be if I spoofed my caller ID to say I was Edward James Olmos. I suppose we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see how the law actually plays out and what they officially define as &#8220;misleading&#8221; and &#8220;deceit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Caller ID Spoofing</title>
		<link>http://freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php/comment-page-1#comment-6689</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Caller ID Spoofing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freecalleridspoofing.com/?p=228#comment-6689</guid>
		<description>As of the date of this comment, it hasn&#039;t been passed into law. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1258
However, if it were illegal, to mask your caller id, the government would have to shut down legit business like Google Voice, Vonage and even Magic Jack or any voice over internet  business that will mask a caller id to make it look like the subscribers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of the date of this comment, it hasn&#8217;t been passed into law. <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1258" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1258</a><br />
However, if it were illegal, to mask your caller id, the government would have to shut down legit business like Google Voice, Vonage and even Magic Jack or any voice over internet  business that will mask a caller id to make it look like the subscribers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Congress</title>
		<link>http://freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php/comment-page-1#comment-6687</link>
		<dc:creator>US Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freecalleridspoofing.com/?p=228#comment-6687</guid>
		<description>Um... check out the &quot;Truth in Caller ID Act of 2010,&quot; shit sounds pretty illegal to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; check out the &#8220;Truth in Caller ID Act of 2010,&#8221; shit sounds pretty illegal to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php/feed ) in 0.86483 seconds, on Feb 6th, 2012 at 3:00 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 13th, 2012 at 3:00 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  freecalleridspoofing.com/is-caller-id-spoofing-legal-228.php/feed ) in 0.01651 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 11:37 pm UTC. -->
